Effect of bosentan on exercise capacity and clinical worsening in patients with dual down and eisenmenger syndrome.

This single-center, retrospective analysis evaluated long-term bosentan treatment in adult patients (n = 7) with both Down and Eisenmenger syndromes (DS-ES). Laboratory tests, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), functional class, and Doppler echocardiography were assessed at baseline and during 2 years' follow-up. Improvements or maintenance of 6MWD were observed (68 m improvement from baseline at month 12) after bosentan initiation. 6MWD was maintained up to year 2. Overall, 6 patients experienced a significant improvement in functional class during 2 years' therapy (P = 0.01). There were no significant changes in parameters measured by Doppler echocardiography. None of the patients required either hospitalization or additional pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy because of PAH progression. Bosentan treatment was generally well tolerated; no liver function abnormalities or serious adverse drug reactions were noted. In this DS-ES cohort, bosentan seemed to be well tolerated and clinically effective.

Can we improve the treatment of congestion in heart failure?

INTRODUCTION: Dyspnoea and peripheral oedema, caused by fluid redistribution to the lungs and/or by fluid overload, are the main causes of hospitalization in patients with heart failure and are associated with poor outcomes. Treatment of fluid overload should relieve symptoms and have a neutral or favorable effect on outcomes. AREAS COVERED: We first consider the results obtained with furosemide administration, which is still the mainstay of treatment of congestion in patients with heart failure. We then discuss important shortcomings of furosemide treatment, including the development of resistance and side effects (electrolyte abnormalities, neurohormonal activation, worsening renal function), as well as the relationship of furosemide - and its doses - with patient prognosis. Finally, the results obtained with potential alternatives to furosemide treatment, including different modalities of loop diuretic administration, combined diuretic therapy, dopamine, inotropic agents, ultrafiltration, natriuretic peptides, vasopressin and adenosine antagonists, are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Relief of congestion is a major objective of heart failure treatment but therapy remains based on the administration of furosemide, an agent that is often not effective and is associated with poor outcomes. The results of the few controlled studies aimed at the assessment of new treatments to overcome resistance to furosemide and/or to protect the kidney from its untoward effects have been mostly neutral. Better treatment of congestion in heart failure remains a major unmet need.

[Treatment of heart failure patients with inotropic drugs: beyond traditional agents]. / La terapia con inotropi del paziente con insufficienza cardiaca: oltre i farmaci tradizionali.

Hospitalizations for acute heart failure are associated with high mortality and readmission rates. Ten to 20% of the patients have signs of low cardiac output and fluid overload. The administration of inotropic agents to correct these hemodynamic abnormalities may be indicated in these patients. However, the risk to benefit ratio of inotropic agents is high and an increase of untoward effects and mortality has been suggested by many retrospective analyses and meta-analyses. Limitations of inotropic therapy seem mainly related to their mechanisms of action based, in the case of the traditional agents, on an increase in intracellular cyclic AMP and calcium concentrations. Concomitant peripheral vasodilation, such as in the case of the novel agent levosimendan is another important limitation, above when patients are hypotensive and/or treated with vasodilators and high doses of diuretics. Myosin activators, histaroxime, sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase activators and metabolic agents seem promising as active through different mechanisms than traditional agents and, in many cases, not associated with tachycardia or hypotension. Further studies are, however, needed.

Successful switch to sitaxsentan in a patient with HIV-related pulmonary arterial hypertension and late intolerance to nonselective endothelin receptor blockade.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH] is a rare but well-known cardiovascular condition potentially associated with human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection and is currently recognized to be one of the most ominous noninfectious HIV complications. Although there is no clear evidence supporting the use of any medication for the treatment of HIV-related PAH, many of the currently available agents have been shown to exert some clinical benefits HIV-PAH patients. To date, no data are available regarding the potential effects of sitaxsentan, a selective endothelin type-A receptor antagonist, in this peculiar patient population. We report the case of a successful switch to sitaxsentan in a HIV-infected patient with PAH initially receiving bosentan who developed a late treatment-related side-effect.

Worsening renal function in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure: clinical implications and prognostic significance.

BACKGROUND: Renal function is a powerful prognostic variable in patients with heart failure (HF). Hospitalisations for acute HF (AHF) may be associated with further worsening of renal function (WRF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed the clinical significance of WRF in 318 consecutive patients admitted at our institute for AHF. WRF was defined as the occurrence, at any time during the hospitalisation, of both a > or =25% and a > or =0.3 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine (s-Cr) from admission (WRF-Abs-%). RESULTS: Patients were followed for 480+/-363 days. Fifty-three patients (17%) died and 132 (41%) were rehospitalised for HF. WRF-Abs-% occurred in 107 (34%) patients. At multivariable survival analysis, WRF-Abs-% was an independent predictor of death or HF rehospitalisation (adjusted HR, 1.47; 95%CI, 1.13-1.81; p=0.024). The independent predictors of WRF-Abs-%, evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, were history of chronic kidney disease (p=0.002), LV ejection fraction (p=0.012), furosemide daily dose (p=0.03) and NYHA class (p=0.05) on admission. CONCLUSION: WRF is a frequent finding in patients hospitalised for AHF and is associated with a poor prognosis. Severity of HF and daily furosemide dose are the most important predictors of the occurrence of WRF.

[Acute heart failure: clinical profiles and pathophysiology]. / L'insufficienza cardiaca acuta: profili clinici e fisiopatologia.

Acute heart failure (HF) is the most common diagnosis at discharge in patients aged > 65 years. It carries a dismal prognosis with a high in-hospital mortality rate and very high post-discharge mortality and rehospitalization rates. It is a complex clinical syndrome that is challenging to define as it may vary widely with respect to underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical presentations. Different clinical scenarios have prognostic significance and may influence therapeutic options. Amongst the main clinical presentations, we may include the following: de novo HF vs acutely decompensated chronic HF, HF caused, and/or worsened, by myocardial ischemia, acute HF with low, normal, or high systolic blood pressure, acute HF caused by hydrosaline retention or fluid redistribution to the lungs, acute HF with comorbidities (diabetes, anemia, renal insufficiency, etc.). Different pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical presentations may coexist in the same patient. Identification and, whenever possible, treatment of underlying pathophyisiological mechanisms should be a primary objective of acute HF management.

The role of plasma biomarkers in acute heart failure. Serial changes and independent prognostic value of NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin-T.

AIMS: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), NT-proBNP and troponins are useful for the assessment of patients with heart failure. Few data exist about their serial changes and their prognostic value in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: NT-proBNP and troponin-T plasma levels were measured at baseline, after 6, 12, 24, 48 h and at discharge in 116 consecutive patients with AHF and no evidence of acute coronary syndrome. NT-proBNP levels were 4421 pg/mL at baseline, declined after 24 h and reached their nadir at 48 h (2703 pg/mL). Troponin-T was detectable in 48% of patients. During a median follow-up of 184 days, 52 patients died or had a non-fatal cardiovascular hospitalisation. At a multivariable analysis including clinical and echo-Doppler variables, NT-proBNP plasma levels at discharge, detectable troponin-T plasma levels, and NYHA class at discharge were the only independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: In patients with AHF, NT-proBNP levels decline 24 h after the initiation of intravenous therapy and troponin-T is detectable in 48% of cases. NT-proBNP levels at discharge, detectable troponin-T levels, NYHA class and serum sodium have independent prognostic value.

Anemia and heart failure: a cause of progression or only a consequence?

Anemia is one of the most frequent co-morbidities in the patients with heart failure. Its prevalence increases from 4-7% in the subjects with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction to >30% in the patients with severe heart failure. Renal insufficiency, activation of inflammatory mediators, and treatment with renin-angiotensin antagonists seem to be its main determinants. The results of many studies agree in showing that anemia is a powerful independent determinant of survival in patients with heart failure. However, the mechanisms of this relation are still incompletely understood. Moreover a favourable effect on prognosis of the correction of anemia has not been shown, yet, and also controlled studies assessing its effects on exercise tolerance have yielded controversial results.

Bisoprolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure: from pathophysiology to clinical pharmacology and trial results.

Clinical trials have consistently shown the benefits of beta-blocker treatment in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). As a result, bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol succinate are now indicated for the treatment of all patients with chronic HF who do not have major contraindications. Bisoprolol is the first beta-blocker shown to improve survival in an outcome trial. In the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II), all-cause mortality and sudden death were reduced in patients treated with bisoprolol compared with those on placebo (11.8% vs 17.3%; p < 0.0001 and 3.6% vs 6.3%, p < 0.002; respectively) regardless of age, NYHA functional class, and co-morbidities. Further studies have shown both the efficacy of bisoprolol on secondary endpoints and patients subgroups as well its high cost effectiveness. More recently, CIBIS-III has shown similar efficacy and safety of the initiation of HF treatment with either bisoprolol or enalapril, with a tendency to a survival advantage with bisoprolol. Nowadays, the role of bisoprolol, as well as that of carvedilol and metoprolol succinate, in HF treatment is firmly established and research is mainly focused on implementation of treatment and better dosing. This article will summarize evidence for the efficacy of bisoprolol in the treatment of HF.